This is more a cool aviation geek story than anything that’s actually significant (which I kinda feel is what we all need at this point).
In this post:
Qantas ending all international flying
As we recently learned, Qantas will be suspending all international flying in a few days, before the end of March. This comes as Australia has added strict measures on people entering the country, making it tough for the airline to continue international operations.
Challenges with Qantas’ Sydney To Singapore to London flight
One of Qantas’ flagship routes is their flight from Sydney to Singapore to London, which is scheduled to operate westbound through March 26, and eastbound through March 27.
The Sydney to London route can’t be operated nonstop, so Singapore is chosen as the stopover point. The airline has fifth freedom rights on the flight, meaning passengers can choose to fly just a segment of that as well (including from Singapore to London).
Well, the airline has just run into a major hurdle — Singapore is no longer allowing transit passengers. That means the airline can no longer fly from Sydney to Singapore to London with transit passengers, which kind of eliminates the point of using Singapore as a stopover.
Singapore Changi is no longer allowing transit passengers
Qantas now operating London flights via Darwin
Qantas has gotten creative, as noted by Executive Traveller — for the last few days the flight is offered, QF1 and QF2 will operate via Darwin rather than Singapore. Suffice to say that’s the first time Darwin has seen scheduled A380 service, let alone an A380 nonstop to Europe.
For that matter, I think this may be the first ever nonstop A380 passenger flight from Australia to London?
With this, the Sydney to Darwin flight covers a distance of 1,957 miles, and the Darwin to London flight covers a distance of 8,620 miles. That long haul flight is just ~40 miles longer than Qantas’ normal longest A380 route, between Sydney and Dallas.
Why the Darwin stopover?
Since Darwin is in northern Australia, it’s the closest major Australian airport to London
This is pretty much as direct as you can fly from Sydney to London — a nonstop Sydney to London flight would cover 10,573 miles, while this routing is just four miles longer
By keeping this a domestic flight, the airline won’t deal with the ever-changing immigration and transit policies of other countries
Qantas is flying the A380 nonstop from Darwin to London
The airline is purely using Darwin for refueling, so you can’t book the A380 between Sydney and Darwin, or between Darwin and London.
The flight is operated with the following schedule:
QF1 Sydney to Darwin departing 5:00PM arriving 9:15PM QF1 Darwin to London departing 11:00PM arriving 6:15AM (+1 day)
QF2 London to Darwin departing 10:05PM arriving 11:45M (+1 day) QF2 Darwin to Sydney departing 1:15AM arriving 7:00AM
Qantas A380 first class
Bottom line
For the next couple of days Qantas will operate their QF1 & QF2 service via Darwin rather than Singapore. After that Qantas will be cutting all international routes.
As I said above, this ultimately isn’t that significant, though as an aviation geek it sure is cool to see an A380 flying nonstop from Australia to London.
However, one woman was still shocked to find a 4.5-meter (14.8-foot) albino Burmese python on her front porch in Oxenford, Queensland, on Monday.
The 50-kilogram (110-pound) snake was large enough to eat a dog, and removing the animal required the specialist skills of snake catcher Tony Harrison.
Harrison told CNN the snake is the biggest he has seen in more than 20,000 call outs since he started his business in 1994.
The unfortunate woman who found the snake was so taken aback she was still shaking when Harrison left her property, he said, but the snake catcher soon realized the huge reptile was docile.
"It's been kept in captivity its whole life," he said, describing it as a "gentle giant" and a "pussycat."
When Harrison picked his son Jensen up from school he took him to see the massive snake in his truck and took photos of them both holding it.
Burmese pythons are illegal in Australia and this one must have escaped from its enclosure, Harrison said, adding that he has only found two of these sorts of snakes during his long career.
The first was just a meter long (3.3 feet) and about as thick as a human wrist, while this was one more than four times as long and "as thick as your leg," he said.
The snakes pose a big threat to biosecurity if they escape, and this one was easily big enough to eat dogs and cats, said Harrison.
It was missing its tail and was covered in scars, he added.
Harrison later handed the snake over to local authorities, and told CNN it has already been put down.
Harrison documents his work on his Facebook page "Gold Coast and Brisbane Snake Catcher," posting photos and videos of the snake relocations he carries out.
In December a Brisbane woman found a 10-foot python wrapped around her Christmas tree on her balcony.
Instead of calling in a snake catcher, the woman and her partner left the python to its own devices and it eventually slithered away.
This is more a cool aviation geek story than anything that’s actually significant (which I kinda feel is what we all need at this point).
In this post:
Qantas ending all international flying
As we recently learned, Qantas will be suspending all international flying in a few days, before the end of March. This comes as Australia has added strict measures on people entering the country, making it tough for the airline to continue international operations.
Challenges with Qantas’ Sydney To Singapore to London flight
One of Qantas’ flagship routes is their flight from Sydney to Singapore to London, which is scheduled to operate westbound through March 26, and eastbound through March 27.
The Sydney to London route can’t be operated nonstop, so Singapore is chosen as the stopover point. The airline has fifth freedom rights on the flight, meaning passengers can choose to fly just a segment of that as well (including from Singapore to London).
Well, the airline has just run into a major hurdle — Singapore is no longer allowing transit passengers. That means the airline can no longer fly from Sydney to Singapore to London with transit passengers, which kind of eliminates the point of using Singapore as a stopover.
Singapore Changi is no longer allowing transit passengers
Qantas now operating London flights via Darwin
Qantas has gotten creative, as noted by Executive Traveller — for the last few days the flight is offered, QF1 and QF2 will operate via Darwin rather than Singapore. Suffice to say that’s the first time Darwin has seen scheduled A380 service, let alone an A380 nonstop to Europe.
For that matter, I think this may be the first ever nonstop A380 passenger flight from Australia to London?
With this, the Sydney to Darwin flight covers a distance of 1,957 miles, and the Darwin to London flight covers a distance of 8,620 miles. That long haul flight is just ~40 miles longer than Qantas’ normal longest A380 route, between Sydney and Dallas.
Why the Darwin stopover?
Since Darwin is in northern Australia, it’s the closest major Australian airport to London
This is pretty much as direct as you can fly from Sydney to London — a nonstop Sydney to London flight would cover 10,573 miles, while this routing is just four miles longer
By keeping this a domestic flight, the airline won’t deal with the ever-changing immigration and transit policies of other countries
Qantas is flying the A380 nonstop from Darwin to London
The airline is purely using Darwin for refueling, so you can’t book the A380 between Sydney and Darwin, or between Darwin and London.
The flight is operated with the following schedule:
QF1 Sydney to Darwin departing 5:00PM arriving 9:15PM QF1 Darwin to London departing 11:00PM arriving 6:15AM (+1 day)
QF2 London to Darwin departing 10:05PM arriving 11:45M (+1 day) QF2 Darwin to Sydney departing 1:15AM arriving 7:00AM
Qantas A380 first class
Bottom line
For the next couple of days Qantas will operate their QF1 & QF2 service via Darwin rather than Singapore. After that Qantas will be cutting all international routes.
As I said above, this ultimately isn’t that significant, though as an aviation geek it sure is cool to see an A380 flying nonstop from Australia to London.
However, one woman was still shocked to find a 4.5-meter (14.8-foot) albino Burmese python on her front porch in Oxenford, Queensland, on Monday.
The 50-kilogram (110-pound) snake was large enough to eat a dog, and removing the animal required the specialist skills of snake catcher Tony Harrison.
Harrison told CNN the snake is the biggest he has seen in more than 20,000 call outs since he started his business in 1994.
The unfortunate woman who found the snake was so taken aback she was still shaking when Harrison left her property, he said, but the snake catcher soon realized the huge reptile was docile.
"It's been kept in captivity its whole life," he said, describing it as a "gentle giant" and a "pussycat."
When Harrison picked his son Jensen up from school he took him to see the massive snake in his truck and took photos of them both holding it.
Burmese pythons are illegal in Australia and this one must have escaped from its enclosure, Harrison said, adding that he has only found two of these sorts of snakes during his long career.
The first was just a meter long (3.3 feet) and about as thick as a human wrist, while this was one more than four times as long and "as thick as your leg," he said.
The snakes pose a big threat to biosecurity if they escape, and this one was easily big enough to eat dogs and cats, said Harrison.
It was missing its tail and was covered in scars, he added.
Harrison later handed the snake over to local authorities, and told CNN it has already been put down.
Harrison documents his work on his Facebook page "Gold Coast and Brisbane Snake Catcher," posting photos and videos of the snake relocations he carries out.
In December a Brisbane woman found a 10-foot python wrapped around her Christmas tree on her balcony.
Instead of calling in a snake catcher, the woman and her partner left the python to its own devices and it eventually slithered away.
On Thursday, the Ruby Princess cruise ship docked in Sydney with dozens of undiagnosed coronavirus cases onboard.
Almost 2,700 passengers - some coughing and spluttering - were allowed to leave the ship at Sydney Harbour, catching trains, buses and even overseas flights to get home.
More than 130 people from the cruise have now tested positive, making it the biggest single source of infections in Australia. One passenger died in hospital on Tuesday.
The saga has caused much anger: why was the ship allowed to dock and unload people?
What passengers were told
Passengers have vented their anger over how the situation was handled by ship operator Princess Cruises and Australian authorities.
Elisa McCafferty, an Australian woman who flew home to London with her husband immediately after disembarking, told the BBC: "Nothing was said at anytime about anyone being sick onboard. It was a distinct lack of information coming through from Princess the entire time."
She only learned of the danger while collecting her bags at Heathrow Airport.
"I turned on my phone and I started getting all these notifications from people back in Australia saying 'there's been confirmed cases on the Ruby,'" she said.
"And I was just absolutely petrified. We had just been on two full flights - what if we had infected someone?"
She said she now had a dry cough, fever, body aches and fatigue - and they were self-isolating at home. They were also concerned about their elderly parents and friends who were on the trip too.
Other passengers recalled coming into contact with sick people on the boat and said there were no warnings.
"I think that they let us down," said Bill Beerens, a Sydney man who tested positive for the virus in hospital on the day he disembarked.
"I do honestly believe that they [cruise ship management] knew what was going on and they just wanted us off the boat," he told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation.
Elderly couple Rona and Michael Doubrin said they had symptoms towards the end of the cruise but had not been concerned, because they had not been told to practice social distancing.
"People were going down to the pool, we were lying in the sun, eating in the dining room, dancing, seeing shows," Ms Doubrin told Daily Mail Australia.
"We would have isolated ourselves in the cabin if we'd known. We're not spring chickens - we're high risk."
What happened in Sydney?
After an 11-day voyage, the ship returned to the city before dawn, cutting short its final New Zealand leg as the nation announced a travel ban.
At the time, according to NSW Health, about a dozen passengers reported feeling unwell and they had swabs taken for Covid-19. An ambulance took a passenger to hospital. (The woman, aged in her 70s, died on Tuesday, authorities said.)
But other passengers on board weren't told of this. Instead, thousands streamed off the boat at Circular Quay, just across from the Sydney Opera House. The bustling area leads directly into the city centre, with transit links to the airport and outer suburbs.
But the Ruby Princess passengers weren't screened and were unmonitored when they left the ship. About a third were international passengers - they were told they could travel overseas immediately or self-isolate in Sydney for a fortnight.
"They even said, you can get a train home," said Ms McCafferty.
New South Wales health officials have said they followed national guidelines which allow passengers to disembark if the route is considered "low risk". The Ruby Princess was given that status because it had been to New Zealand only.
One day after the ship docked, officials revealed the first cases of Covid-19 confirmed in three people who had been on board - two passengers and a crew member.
It prompted a scramble to track down everyone else who had been on board.
And at least 21 of the 48 people who had tested positive by Monday were found in other Australian states. By Tuesday, the total number of cases linked to the ship had climbed to 133.
How did this happen?
It is hardly the first cruise ship to see infections - the Diamond Princess, also operated by Princess Cruises, drew global focus in February. Its passengers were quarantined for almost a month off the coast of Japan before being repatriated. More than 600 cases were linked to the ship.
Governments at Australia's state and federal level have pointed blame at each other. Princess Cruises has said it followed official guidelines.
On Saturday, The Australian newspaper reported that the ship had logged 158 ill passengers on its previous voyage to New Zealand. Nine people were tested upon arrival in Sydney on 8 March - and their tests results came back negative. However, two passengers from that journey were found to have tested positive after flying home to Darwin.
NSW port and health authorities declined to reply to BBC questions about these reports.
What have authorities said?
On Monday, Prime Minister Scott Morrison described the mistake as the responsibility of state officials.
NSW Health Minister Brad Hazzard told reporters on Saturday: "With the benefit of what we now know... I'd have said 'yeah, maybe we should hold them on the ship.'"
But he rejected Canberra's accusations that state officials had not properly checked cruise ships upon entry.
"New South Wales is actually going over and above what the national guidelines are," said Mr Hazzard.
State health officials stressed they had run assessments "well beyond federal requirements" for 63 ships which have entered the harbour since mid-February.
Others noted that while Canberra had enacted a ban on cruise ships arriving, it had allowed four including the Ruby Princess to be exempt.
Four other cruise ships into Sydney have been linked to confirmed Covid-19 cases. The Ovation of the Seas ship, which docked in Sydney a day before the Ruby Princess, has seen five positive tests.
Health officials say infected patients are in self-isolation or in hospital. All passengers have been told to quarantine themselves.
In the wake of the Ruby Princess bungle, Western Australia on Monday questioned where it would allow a cruise ship to dock there. The European ship Magnifica is carrying 1,700 passengers - about 250 of whom are reported to have respiratory illnesses.
It was allowed to dock on Tuesday to refuel, but all on board were banned from disembarking.
Premier Mark McGowan had stressed: "I will not allow what happened in Sydney to happen here."
This is more a cool aviation geek story than anything that’s actually significant (which I kinda feel is what we all need at this point).
In this post:
Qantas ending all international flying
As we recently learned, Qantas will be suspending all international flying in a few days, before the end of March. This comes as Australia has added strict measures on people entering the country, making it tough for the airline to continue international operations.
Challenges with Qantas’ Sydney To Singapore to London flight
One of Qantas’ flagship routes is their flight from Sydney to Singapore to London, which is scheduled to operate westbound through March 26, and eastbound through March 27.
The Sydney to London route can’t be operated nonstop, so Singapore is chosen as the stopover point. The airline has fifth freedom rights on the flight, meaning passengers can choose to fly just a segment of that as well (including from Singapore to London).
Well, the airline has just run into a major hurdle — Singapore is no longer allowing transit passengers. That means the airline can no longer fly from Sydney to Singapore to London with transit passengers, which kind of eliminates the point of using Singapore as a stopover.
Singapore Changi is no longer allowing transit passengers
Qantas now operating London flights via Darwin
Qantas has gotten creative, as noted by Executive Traveller — for the last few days the flight is offered, QF1 and QF2 will operate via Darwin rather than Singapore. Suffice to say that’s the first time Darwin has seen scheduled A380 service, let alone an A380 nonstop to Europe.
For that matter, I think this may be the first ever nonstop A380 passenger flight from Australia to London?
With this, the Sydney to Darwin flight covers a distance of 1,957 miles, and the Darwin to London flight covers a distance of 8,620 miles. That long haul flight is just ~40 miles longer than Qantas’ normal longest A380 route, between Sydney and Dallas.
Why the Darwin stopover?
Since Darwin is in northern Australia, it’s the closest major Australian airport to London
This is pretty much as direct as you can fly from Sydney to London — a nonstop Sydney to London flight would cover 10,573 miles, while this routing is just four miles longer
By keeping this a domestic flight, the airline won’t deal with the ever-changing immigration and transit policies of other countries
Qantas is flying the A380 nonstop from Darwin to London
The airline is purely using Darwin for refueling, so you can’t book the A380 between Sydney and Darwin, or between Darwin and London.
The flight is operated with the following schedule:
QF1 Sydney to Darwin departing 5:00PM arriving 9:15PM QF1 Darwin to London departing 11:00PM arriving 6:15AM (+1 day)
QF2 London to Darwin departing 10:05PM arriving 11:45M (+1 day) QF2 Darwin to Sydney departing 1:15AM arriving 7:00AM
Qantas A380 first class
Bottom line
For the next couple of days Qantas will operate their QF1 & QF2 service via Darwin rather than Singapore. After that Qantas will be cutting all international routes.
As I said above, this ultimately isn’t that significant, though as an aviation geek it sure is cool to see an A380 flying nonstop from Australia to London.
On Thursday, the Ruby Princess cruise ship docked in Sydney with dozens of undiagnosed coronavirus cases onboard.
Almost 2,700 passengers - some coughing and spluttering - were allowed to leave the ship at Sydney Harbour, catching trains, buses and even overseas flights to get home.
More than 130 people from the cruise have now tested positive, making it the biggest single source of infections in Australia. One passenger died in hospital on Tuesday.
The saga has caused much anger: why was the ship allowed to dock and unload people?
What passengers were told
Passengers have vented their anger over how the situation was handled by ship operator Princess Cruises and Australian authorities.
Elisa McCafferty, an Australian woman who flew home to London with her husband immediately after disembarking, told the BBC: "Nothing was said at anytime about anyone being sick onboard. It was a distinct lack of information coming through from Princess the entire time."
She only learned of the danger while collecting her bags at Heathrow Airport.
"I turned on my phone and I started getting all these notifications from people back in Australia saying 'there's been confirmed cases on the Ruby,'" she said.
"And I was just absolutely petrified. We had just been on two full flights - what if we had infected someone?"
She said she now had a dry cough, fever, body aches and fatigue - and they were self-isolating at home. They were also concerned about their elderly parents and friends who were on the trip too.
Other passengers recalled coming into contact with sick people on the boat and said there were no warnings.
"I think that they let us down," said Bill Beerens, a Sydney man who tested positive for the virus in hospital on the day he disembarked.
"I do honestly believe that they [cruise ship management] knew what was going on and they just wanted us off the boat," he told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation.
Elderly couple Rona and Michael Doubrin said they had symptoms towards the end of the cruise but had not been concerned, because they had not been told to practice social distancing.
"People were going down to the pool, we were lying in the sun, eating in the dining room, dancing, seeing shows," Ms Doubrin told Daily Mail Australia.
"We would have isolated ourselves in the cabin if we'd known. We're not spring chickens - we're high risk."
What happened in Sydney?
After an 11-day voyage, the ship returned to the city before dawn, cutting short its final New Zealand leg as the nation announced a travel ban.
At the time, according to NSW Health, about a dozen passengers reported feeling unwell and they had swabs taken for Covid-19. An ambulance took a passenger to hospital. (The woman, aged in her 70s, died on Tuesday, authorities said.)
But other passengers on board weren't told of this. Instead, thousands streamed off the boat at Circular Quay, just across from the Sydney Opera House. The bustling area leads directly into the city centre, with transit links to the airport and outer suburbs.
But the Ruby Princess passengers weren't screened and were unmonitored when they left the ship. About a third were international passengers - they were told they could travel overseas immediately or self-isolate in Sydney for a fortnight.
"They even said, you can get a train home," said Ms McCafferty.
New South Wales health officials have said they followed national guidelines which allow passengers to disembark if the route is considered "low risk". The Ruby Princess was given that status because it had been to New Zealand only.
One day after the ship docked, officials revealed the first cases of Covid-19 confirmed in three people who had been on board - two passengers and a crew member.
It prompted a scramble to track down everyone else who had been on board.
And at least 21 of the 48 people who had tested positive by Monday were found in other Australian states. By Tuesday, the total number of cases linked to the ship had climbed to 133.
How did this happen?
It is hardly the first cruise ship to see infections - the Diamond Princess, also operated by Princess Cruises, drew global focus in February. Its passengers were quarantined for almost a month off the coast of Japan before being repatriated. More than 600 cases were linked to the ship.
Governments at Australia's state and federal level have pointed blame at each other. Princess Cruises has said it followed official guidelines.
On Saturday, The Australian newspaper reported that the ship had logged 158 ill passengers on its previous voyage to New Zealand. Nine people were tested upon arrival in Sydney on 8 March - and their tests results came back negative. However, two passengers from that journey were found to have tested positive after flying home to Darwin.
NSW port and health authorities declined to reply to BBC questions about these reports.
What have authorities said?
On Monday, Prime Minister Scott Morrison described the mistake as the responsibility of state officials.
NSW Health Minister Brad Hazzard told reporters on Saturday: "With the benefit of what we now know... I'd have said 'yeah, maybe we should hold them on the ship.'"
But he rejected Canberra's accusations that state officials had not properly checked cruise ships upon entry.
"New South Wales is actually going over and above what the national guidelines are," said Mr Hazzard.
State health officials stressed they had run assessments "well beyond federal requirements" for 63 ships which have entered the harbour since mid-February.
Others noted that while Canberra had enacted a ban on cruise ships arriving, it had allowed four including the Ruby Princess to be exempt.
Four other cruise ships into Sydney have been linked to confirmed Covid-19 cases. The Ovation of the Seas ship, which docked in Sydney a day before the Ruby Princess, has seen five positive tests.
Health officials say infected patients are in self-isolation or in hospital. All passengers have been told to quarantine themselves.
In the wake of the Ruby Princess bungle, Western Australia on Monday questioned where it would allow a cruise ship to dock there. The European ship Magnifica is carrying 1,700 passengers - about 250 of whom are reported to have respiratory illnesses.
It was allowed to dock on Tuesday to refuel, but all on board were banned from disembarking.
Premier Mark McGowan had stressed: "I will not allow what happened in Sydney to happen here."